| The Science, Business and Controversy of Genetically Engineered Seeds |
| Thursday, 15 October 2009 | Aaron Lada, Ph.D. | Article |
|
With it now possible to move virtually any gene between any two organisms, developing new plant varieties has become increasingly high-tech. Genetically engineered (GE) seeds, also known as genetically modified (GM) seeds, offer resistance to pests, diseases and drought, as well as higher-yielding plants with greater nutritional value. Although the technology faces widespread opposition among the general public, a large business in seed technology has developed around this science. Here’s what you need to know about the pros and cons of GE seeds: The Science of Genetic Engineering The vector is isolated from the bacteria and inserted into the target cell, which for multicellular organisms will be a fertilized egg. For animal cells, the vector can be directly injected into the cell’s nucleus to combine with its DNA, while for plant cells a special gun is used to “shoot” it through the cell wall into the nucleus. Once the foreign gene is inserted, the new transgenic organism will express the gene, producing whatever protein it encodes. There are many uses for the GE technology, including
GE Seeds
Patents for Seeds A major step for GE seeds came with a US Supreme Court decision in 1980, allowing the broader-reaching utility patent to be granted for inventions of living organisms. These utility patents added more protection than both the plant patent and the PVPCs, most notably control of the seeds produced by the plant. Thus, farmers who buy GE seeds may not be allowed to collect seeds from their crops to plant the next season. A Growing Controversy A major health concern of GE seeds used for food crops is that adding foreign genes could introduce new allergens, possibly triggering a reaction in some people to a food thought to be safe. Serious environmental issues include:
Among other considerations are the fear that global agriculture will be controlled by the corporations that produce GE seeds and the ethical issues surrounding genetic engineering. While GE seeds for corn, cotton and soybeans are widely used by large farms in the US, most seeds sold to the public are not GE due in part to higher cost and opposition to the technology. One of the nation’s largest seed sellers, W. Atlee Burpee & Co., does not sell any GE seeds, and many other companies have also made a point to label their products as “non GE.” Developing novel varieties of plants is nothing new; however, genetic engineering has made it feasible to produce specialized plants not possible by normal breeding techniques. While embraced by large-scale farmers, the general public still seems reluctant to accept GE seeds. Any improvements GE seeds may offer will need to be balanced with assurances of safety, responsible use and education to better inform consumers about this intriguing, but possibly detrimental technology. Additional resources: Comments
(2)
Written by Aaron Lada , October 21, 2009
Thanks for your comments. This article was not meant to be for or against GE seeds, instead, just presenting the basic information behind the technology. Stay tuned, I will have a future article that does get into the pros and cons of GE foods.
Report abuse
Most of this I will cover in the upcoming article, but just to clarify a few points. Definitely one concern of GE seeds is putting control of crops into the hands of a few corporations. However, the so-called “terminator” genes are not being used in any commercial food crop. One company, Monsanto, acquired a company that had developed this technology, but Monsanto pledged to not use it—whether or not they hold true to this remains to be seen. There are many studies from the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations that do show improved crop yield, less fertilizer and pesticide use, and lower costs associated with GE crops. Don’t let one study sway you one way or the other, but the composite of data from around the world does suggest improved yield, and even in the UCS report they mention that their results doesn’t mean that GE crops won’t perform better in the future. |
Would you eat a plant that had a gene from a bacteria added to it? Would you favor advancements in agriculture that could help relieve world hunger and save millions of lives? These are two of the extreme sides of the debate over the use of GE seeds, considered by proponents as part of the “






http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/science/failure-to-yield.html